<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>miTech &#187; Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://my.portools.com/category/articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://my.portools.com</link>
	<description>technology for human beings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPhone still better than Android</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2009/12/iphone-still-better-than-android/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2009/12/iphone-still-better-than-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#8217;s late 2009. Only 12 days left to go &#8217;till the next decade. And right before the holidays, the iPhone vs. Android war is at an all-time high, especially with the announce of the Nexus One.
Some background. I&#8217;m 14. I love Linux and have been using it for the past 10 years. I love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s late 2009. Only 12 days left to go &#8217;till the next decade. And right before the holidays, the iPhone vs. Android war is at an all-time high, especially with the announce of the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/12/nexus-one-google-phone-picture/"  target="_blank">Nexus One</a>.</p>
<p>Some background. I&#8217;m 14. I love Linux and have been using it for the past 10 years. I love everything open source. And at the same time I love the inarguable beauty, the amazing simplicity, and functionality of Apple&#8217;s products. I am in the position of choosing between either the iPhone 3GS 16GB or the HTC Hero/HTC Droid Eris/Motorola Droid/Google Nexus One. I&#8217;ll try to give an honest comparison here, and I will say, I love Google, and I love open source, so there is a slight bias towards that end.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s size them up. I&#8217;ll be comparing the proposed Google Nexus One (the not-yet-released but best Android phone yet) to the iPhone 3GS 16GB.</p>
<p><strong>Hardware:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>CPU</strong> &#8211; the Nexus One processor is a SnapDragon (about ~1 Ghz), which is far better than the one in the iPhone (800 Mhz underclocked to 600 Mhz for battery life). <strong>Nexus One</strong> wins. By far.</li>
<li><strong>RAM</strong> &#8211; 320 MB on the Nexus One (unconfirmed) vs 256MB on the iPhone. <strong>Nexus One </strong>also takes this one, but not by much.</li>
<li><strong>Storage</strong> &#8211; iPhone &#8211; 16GB, Nexus One &#8211; up to 16GB with a microSD card. <strong>Tie.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Display</strong> &#8211; Nexus One has 800&#215;480px resolution, and 3.7 inch display size which far outperforms the 320&#215;240 resolution and 3.5 inch size of the iPhone. <strong>Nexus One</strong> takes this one, again by far.</li>
<li><strong>Camera</strong> &#8211; iPhone has 3 megapixels with tap-to-focus, Nexus One has 5 megapixels with flash and autofocus. <strong>Nexus One</strong> definitely wins.</li>
<li><strong>Battery</strong> &#8211; No details on the battery life of the Nexus One yet. The iPhone isn&#8217;t that bad in that department, but the Nexus One has a user-replaceable battery. But still <strong>tie</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>FM Radio</strong> &#8211; iPhone doesn&#8217;t have one, Nexus One does. &#8216;Nuff said. I use this a <strong>lot</strong>. So <strong>Nexus One</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Size</strong> &#8211; Nexus One supposedly much thinner than iPhone. Screen is bigger. <strong>Nexus One</strong> again.</li>
<li><strong>Additional features</strong> &#8211; Both have compasses, accelerometers, Bluetooth, and WiFi. <strong>Tie.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Well, as you can see, hardware-wise, the Nexus One is far better than the iPhone. But hardware is only half the story. Let&#8217;s move on to software.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Widgets</strong> &#8211; I gotta say, I love the widgets on Android. I&#8217;d love the ability to pull a device out of my pocket, turn it on, and see the weather right there. The Android and iPhone app selectors are about the same. But if you jailbreak your iPhone, you can get widgets on your desktop (more on this in a later post). So it&#8217;s possible. They <strong>tie </strong>for that.</li>
<li><strong>General look and feel</strong> &#8211; Well, it depends. With the new Sense UI, the Hero and Droid Eris have been just beautiful. But it&#8217;s still a game of catch-up with the iPhone, that (in my opinion) just takes the cake in terms of design and general feel. I love it. <strong>iPhone </strong>wins.</li>
<li><strong>App Store</strong> &#8211; Sorry Android. But you have a <strong>far</strong> way to go to get anywhere <strong>near</strong> the quality and amount of iPhone apps on the App Store. &#8220;There&#8217;s an app for that&#8221; is exactly right. The actual selection and the quality of apps on the iPhone far surpasses the Android apps (for now), in part due to the restrictions placed on iPhone app developers. However, in Android&#8217;s defense, Apple had better allow Google Maps Navigation, Google Voice, Google Goggles, and Google Latitude onto the iPhone eventually. Those Android-only apps are making me want to beg Apple. But for now, <strong>iPhone</strong> wins.</li>
<li><strong>Openness</strong> &#8211; Must this be explained? Android is open source. Which makes it extremely open. The Android Market almost never blocks apps (cough cough Apple). But let&#8217;s not forget about jailbreaking, which opens the iPhone up to install whatever we want. But the iPhone is still too closed off in many ways. So <strong>Nexus One</strong> wins, but barely.</li>
<li><strong>App Consistency</strong> &#8211; I love what Apple did. They went and created a GUI toolkit for the iPhone, encouraging app developers to use the existing GUI widgets instead of their own (like what Android does). This provides for a consistent look and feel between apps, and a beautiful overall appearance. <strong>iPhone </strong>wins<strong>.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Fragmentation</strong> &#8211; Mac&#8217;s don&#8217;t have this problem. Neither does the iPhone. Since the hardware is locked down, the software is tightly integrated to work for that hardware. The Android OS can run on a wide variety of hardware (this is a <strong>good</strong> thing), and does so. However, this causes inconsistabilities and is difficult for app developers because their apps work on some, but not all platforms.</li>
<li><strong>Games</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m 14. I love games. Action games, simulator, first person shooters, you name it. And the iPhone has tons of all of those, ranging from Call of Duty to Guitar Hero (Tap Tap Revenge) to Doodle Jump. At this point, the Android Market is severely lagging in the game department. A big downer for me. <strong>iPhone</strong> takes this one.</li>
<li><strong>Multitouch</strong> &#8211; The final one, and (in my opinion) is multitouch. I love multitouch. I tried iPhone&#8217;s browser once and never went back to stylus browsing with my WinMo 2003 PDA. Maps, browsing, apps, everything is amazing with multitouch. But Apple <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/18/googles-nexus-one-no-multitouch/"  target="_blank">holds a patent on that</a>. On the Nexus One, the hardware supports multitouch, but at this point, none of the apps use it (browsing/maps/etc.). Which is a huge downer for me. (However, the HTC Android phones with Sense UI have limited multitouch in browsing, and none in maps.) So definitely <strong>iPhone</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>And one last thing that isn&#8217;t hardware or software related:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Brand Image</strong> &#8211; As of now, the iPhone is a recognized name. Businesses think that producing an iPhone app will add to their growth and popularity, and that&#8217;s true. The same isn&#8217;t [yet] true for the Android, but it&#8217;s slowly becoming more and more known as time goes on. But for now, the <strong>iPhone.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>The iPhone&#8217;s hardware is definitely lacking compared to the Nexus One. But the iPhone software, at this point, far surpasses that of the Nexus One. But don&#8217;t forget, it&#8217;s only a matter of time before the Android Market and the Android software improves. Android is still in its infancy. And due to its open source nature, Android has a much larger chance to improve much faster than the iPhone. So we have something to look forward to in 2010.</p>
<p>But what do you think? If I&#8217;m getting a new phone this season, should I get the iPhone, or should I get the Nexus One and wait for the software to evolve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2009/12/iphone-still-better-than-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed up your Firefox (Linux)</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2009/08/speed-up-your-firefox-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2009/08/speed-up-your-firefox-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmmm, Mozilla. The fast lane? I don&#8217;t think so. If you&#8217;ve been keeping up with all the recent Firefox developments, you might have noticed that Mozilla has been boasting the dramatic speed increase of the newest version of Firefox (3.5, see http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/upgrade.html). Firefox has always been my absolute favorite browser, but even with the newest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, Mozilla. The fast lane? I don&#8217;t think so. If you&#8217;ve been keeping up with all the recent Firefox developments, you might have noticed that Mozilla has been boasting the dramatic speed increase of the newest version of Firefox (3.5, see http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/upgrade.html). Firefox has always been my absolute favorite browser, but even with the newest version, I&#8217;m finding it to be very sluggish on my Ubuntu desktop, my parents&#8217; XP desktop, and especially my new Eeebuntu Netbook (more on that later).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried many things. I&#8217;ve searched the Internet for suggestions and tips on how to speed up my browser. The thing I dislike the most is how long it takes for a browser window to open (on my parents&#8217; old XP machine, IE opens in 3 seconds, FF in 10). There are many Youtube videos, and long lists of items to tweak in your <em>about:config</em>. Well, I&#8217;ve applied every single one of the changes in that list, and I didn&#8217;t notice any difference!</p>
<p>But there is a way, as I&#8217;ve found out today: <strong>optimized Firefox builds</strong>. I&#8217;ve tried Swiftfox before, in fact I use it on my desktop (totally forgot I was using it <img src='http://my.portools.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). <strong>Swiftfox</strong> (<a target="_blank" href="http://getswiftfox.com/" ><em>http://getswiftfox.com/</em></a>) calls itself the &#8220;Optimized Mozilla Firefox Build for Linux&#8221;. Swiftfox is pretty good, but their binaries are closed-source, so I like an alternative better: <strong>Swiftweasel</strong>. Swiftweasel is basically Swiftfox with the proprietary-ness removed (also some neat features added, see their website).</p>
<p>I downloaded their binary, and wow! I&#8217;m typing from Swiftweasel right now, and it opens tabs instantly, loads documents faster than I could&#8217;ve imagined, and opens in a blazing 2 seconds!</p>
<p>You can download Swiftweasel at <em><a target="_blank" href="http://swiftweasel.tuxfamily.org/" >http://swiftweasel.tuxfamily.org/</a></em>. I&#8217;d encourage you to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2009/08/speed-up-your-firefox-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diggnation</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2008/08/diggnation/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2008/08/diggnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I&#8217;m back from my blogging break. I guess I just needed some time to get some new ideas. I expect to be blogging fairly often now.
I&#8217;ll start off this week with a podcast/vodcast called Diggnation. It&#8217;s created by Alex Albrecht and Kevin Rose, 2 great guys that know how to keep people entertained. If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m back from my blogging break. I guess I just needed some time to get some new ideas. I expect to be blogging fairly often now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll start off this week with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast"  target="_blank">podcast</a>/<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vodcast"  target="_blank">vodcast</a> called Diggnation. It&#8217;s created by Alex Albrecht and Kevin Rose, 2 great guys that know how to keep people entertained. If you like <a href="http://digg.com"  target="_blank">Digg.com</a> and you want to hear some of the most popular stuff going on there, along with some humor, fun, and commentary, then watch Diggnation <a href="http://revision3.com/diggnation/"  target="_blank">at revision3.com</a>.</p>
<p>To start you off, I&#8217;ve included the most recent episode here, for your viewing pleasure:</p>
<p><embed loop="false" quality="high" bgcolor="#171717" width="440" height="300" name="rev3_player" id="rev3_player" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" src="http://bitcast-a.bitgravity.com/revision3/swf/rev3_player.swf?AutoPlay=off&#038;Buffer=10&#038;File=http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.flv/bitcast-a.bitgravity.com/revision3/flv/diggnation/0163/diggnation--0163--2008-08-14dolby--large.fl8.flv&#038;ScrubMode=advanced&#038;Thumb=http://bitcast-a.bitgravity.com/revision3/images/shows/diggnation/0163/diggnation--0163--2008-08-14dolby--large.thumb.jpg&#038;DefaultRatio=0.56&#038;AutoSize=off&#038;allowFullScreen=true&#038;AutoPlay=off&#038;videoId=1623&#038;fwNumSlots=0&#038;PostRoll=" base="http://bitcast-a.bitgravity.com/revision3/swf/" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2008/08/diggnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLAX Modules</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2008/06/slax-modules/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2008/06/slax-modules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#8217;t know about SLAX, read my few previous posts about it. It&#8217;s a great, fast, small operating system you can carry around with you.
SLAX has an interesting package manager approach. It&#8217;s quite simple. You download packages, called modules, then you double-click them to install them, and then do that again to uninstall them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t know about SLAX, read my few previous posts about it. It&#8217;s a great, fast, small operating system you can carry around with you.</p>
<p>SLAX has an interesting package manager approach. It&#8217;s quite simple. You download packages, called modules, then you double-click them to install them, and then do that again to uninstall them. It&#8217;s <strong>that</strong> easy. If you go to the SLAX website (http://slax.org) and click on Modules, you will only get ~ 20 modules. This isn&#8217;t the real picture, though. There are actually about 600+ modules available for SLAX, they are just not approved. To access them, you must go to the forum, and click on other people to get a list of their modules. An easy way I have found to find these modules is to go to Google, and type in &#8220;slax &lt;package name&gt;&#8221;, where &lt;package name&gt; can be Firefox, Opera, whatever. For example, to find SuperTux (a great Mario-like game), you would type &#8220;slax supertux&#8221;, to find it. It&#8217;s a great and simple approach, and as they rightfully describe it, &#8220;package management beyond your dreams&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2008/06/slax-modules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLAX again</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2008/06/slax-again/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2008/06/slax-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SLAX &#8212; you&#8221;re my favorite.
I&#8217;ve tried out about 12 Linux distributions on my USB drive. Among them: NimbleX, Mandriva One, Fedora, Ubuntu, KNOPPIX, PCLinuxOS, Puppy Linux, Gentoo, openSUSE, and many more. I&#8217;ve even tried making my own, using Linux From Scratch (more about that later). Every time I installed a new distro, I still remembered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SLAX &#8212; you&#8221;re my favorite.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried out about 12 Linux distributions on my USB drive. Among them: NimbleX, Mandriva One, Fedora, Ubuntu, KNOPPIX, PCLinuxOS, Puppy Linux, Gentoo, openSUSE, and many more. I&#8217;ve even tried making my own, using Linux From Scratch (more about that later). Every time I installed a new distro, I still remembered SLAX, the fast loading, very small sized amazing distribution. In fact, I&#8217;m planning an in-depth review of all the distro&#8217;s I&#8217;ve tested, and many more posts on SLAX.</p>
<p>A general summary: I was able to install tons of applications that I wanted, including the entire GNOME package, in an under 500 MB footprint. And, with my 4GB drive, there is much more room to expand. You can get one for only $20 on Amazon (look for Kingston DataTraveler). And even with the 50+ packages I&#8217;ve installed, SLAX loads in the same 30 seconds as it did before. It does not stop amazing me. This is compared to other distributions, like Ubuntu, which take up 700+ MB, and load in about 2+ minutes from my drive. More about this later.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to thank the entire SLAX community, and all the guys who have provided modules for SLAX, improving my experience greatly. Thanks all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2008/06/slax-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLAX &#8211; Linux for USB</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2008/05/slax-linux-for-usb/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2008/05/slax-linux-for-usb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live distro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Makes Me Wonder, I once blogged about putting Linux onto a USB drive. It worked great, but it started up very slowly. So I set out looking for a lighter-weight Live USB distribution, and stumbled upon SLAX, a small distribution based on Slackware. It starts up within 30 seconds (off my USB drive!) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Makes Me Wonder, I once blogged about putting Linux onto a USB drive. It worked great, but it started up <strong>very</strong> slowly. So I set out looking for a lighter-weight Live USB distribution, and stumbled upon SLAX, a small distribution based on Slackware. It starts up within 30 seconds (off my USB drive!) and runs great.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Installation</span></strong></p>
<p>Go ahead to <a target="_blank" href="http://slax.org/" >http://slax.org/</a> and go to the &#8216;get slax&#8217; page. Choose the &#8216;tar&#8217; version that says USB on it, download it (30 minutes on a fast connection) and unpack the archive (if you don&#8217;t know how, get WinRar at rarlab.com). Copy the &#8216;boot&#8217; and &#8217;slax&#8217; folders onto your drive, and run the bootinst.sh (if on Linux) or bootinst.bat (if on Windows) from the boot folder to make the drive load the operating system. You&#8217;re done!</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Running SLAX</span></strong></p>
<p>Old computers might not be able to boot off a USB drive. Turn off your computer, insert the USB drive, and turn it on, clicking F10, or whatever to enter Setup. There, change the boot order, putting USB-HDD or just USB into the first position. Then Save and Exit setup. The computer will restart and boot off your drive. Once you see the graphical menu, choose &#8216;Boot into Graphical Mode&#8217;. Wait for it to load.</p>
<p>There are many things you can do in SLAX, including installing modules to add functionality (I will post about this later), and doing many other productive (or not) things. My only concern is that it runs KDE, when my preferred window manager is GNOME, but I&#8217;ll live. SLAX is still awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2008/05/slax-linux-for-usb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the New World</title>
		<link>http://my.portools.com/2008/04/welcome-to-the-new-world/</link>
		<comments>http://my.portools.com/2008/04/welcome-to-the-new-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniil Kulchenko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exponential change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.portools.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years ago, finding a piece of information as simple as a biography on someone meant making a special trip to the library, finding a book, checking it out, and driving back. All this took about 30-45 minutes. Today, you can find a biography on someone in 10 seconds. That&#8217;s right: ten seconds.
Driven by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty years ago, finding a piece of information as simple as a biography on someone meant making a special trip to the library, finding a book, checking it out, and driving back. All this took about 30-45 minutes. Today, you can find a biography on someone in 10 seconds. That&#8217;s right: ten seconds.</p>
<p>Driven by the Internet, the New World we live in today is truly different that the world 10, 20, 40 years ago. A short movie I recently saw, Shift Happens 2, outlines changes that have happened over the last few decades. You can find this video on YouTube.</p>
<p>With the recent (or not) appearance of Web 2.0, you can now carry around all your data and programs anywhere you go that has Internet access. The same can be done with USB drives, with a 4 GB drive available for all of $20 (on Amazon), allowing you to put all your programs and data onto it (see portableapps.com). In the near future, you will be able to fit every single piece of music in the world onto a device the size of an iPod.</p>
<p>The world will change drastically over the next 20 years, and we will all be witnesses of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://my.portools.com/2008/04/welcome-to-the-new-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
